Why does US intelligence worry about “transition”?
U.S. security institutions are keen to begin the process of transferring power early between an outgoing administration and an incoming administration during the period between the elections and the official handover of the new president, which lasts for about two and a half months.
This stems from fears that the new administration will begin its work without a look at the intelligence landscape, putting the country at a serious risk.
But the transition between the current Donald Trump administration and joe biden’s supposed lyssed administration is an additional concern.
Trump continues to fail to acknowledge the victory of his Democratic rival, even claiming to win the election and that the process has been marred by fraud, without providing concrete evidence, and refuses to share with Biden the information and reports available to him.
What is even more dangerous, according to a BBC report, is the Republican president’s determination to overthrow the leaders of intelligence institutions, which would put them in a state of internal chaos, as well as political chaos.
Many believe that the dismissal of a group of senior Pentagon civilian leaders, including Defense Secretary Mark Esper, is only the beginning, according to the report.
It’s not just about the issue of accelerating military withdrawal from Afghanistan, it’s about “retaliatory” motives given the strained relationship between Trump and the security and intelligence community.
CIA Director Gina Haspel is now on the line.
Although Haspel has shown a keenness to take a balanced stance, her critics say she was too close to the White House, citing her apparent behavior when she appeared to be a deal-making president in his State of the Union address.
But her supporters say she played cautiously enough in trying to stay with the president to protect the agency from politicization, and feared that if she too was fired, a more partisan figure would be chosen to replace her.
Its apparent unwillingness to declassify some intelligence about Russian interference in the 2016 election has recently drawn criticism from supporters of the president.
scenarios and perhaps the most controversial chapter is the dismissal of FBI Director Chris Ray, the BBC says.
President Trump is believed to be angry at the failure of federal law enforcement authorities to investigate Joe Biden’s son Hunter about his foreign business ties, and wanted some sort of return to 2016, when then-FBI Director James Comey’s public statements about Hillary Clinton’s emails hurt her toward the end of the campaign.
Unlike CIA chiefs who are usually, and not always, replaced by a new president; FBI directors are appointed for 10 years.
It has also been reported that the highly regarded head of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), Chris Krebs, is facing a problem because an agency-run website called “Spread Control” has made it clear that allegations of fraud and voting fraud, including those made by the President and his supporters, are false.
Concerns are being raised about the new appointments and about who will also leave their posts.
Political activists have been given high positions at the Pentagon. One of them, Michael Ellis, was appointed general counsel of the National Security Agency (NSA), although the agency’s chief of staff, General Paul Nakasone, disagreed.
This has raised concerns that the Trump team may try to “plant” people of its supporters in the national security system, so that they can continue to play a role after January 20, when Joe Biden is officially inaugurated as president.
Another option is that simply the president wants to reward loyalists and allow them to “enrich their resumes” with expectations that they will soon implement more controversial policies while in those positions.
Although the new president may be able to replace many of these individuals and select his own team, there are still concerns about the implications of recent appointments.
There is a risk that other States will also seek to capitalize on this period of uncertainty, according to the report, which noted that the Commission investigating the 11 September attacks concluded that the short period of the handover of power from President Bill Clinton to President George W. Bush, which occurred as a result of the controversy over the disputed outcome of the 2000 elections, may have contributed to the failure to stop the devastating attacks on New York and Washington, making it difficult to obtain a new team in all its locations, mechanisms and up-to-date.